it soon affirmed the president after the meeting. – ' ' In my youth carregeui bands in So Paulo that said ' ' It are FMI' ' , but Brazil not pequeno' wants more if to hold as a country; ' , it explained to if to remember that in the past, the government asked for aid to the financial institution and that the conditions which were sumetido they were unpopular. – ' ' Now we go to put money in the FMI. Jeffrey Lacker may not feel the same. It is not chic? ' ' Impagvel.Mas we go to come back to our main subject. In fact, the FMI also gained multiples papers in the combat to the crisis. The G-20 requested that the institution monitors the implementation of the tax policies adopted by the countries; that it emits you alert previous against new turbulences (in set with the Frum de Financial Estabilidade); is partner of the countries in the quarrel on which politics must be adopted. Beyond, it is clearly, to use its resources to increase the world-wide liquidity and to help the emergent countries affected by the crisis, especially of lesser relative development.
' ' ressurreio' ' of the FMI already a little before the meeting of the G-20 had started, when nations as Hungria, the Ukraine, Pakistan and Iceland had appealed to the deep one in search of an emergency aid to balance its balance of payments. It made time that the deep one did not have as many customers. In the period daily pay-crisis of abundance of capital and fluidity of the credit, the developing countries had made reforms, accumulated reserves and left the FMI to the flies. Moreover, the institution still fight against a strong stigma. The countries prevent to all appeal to the deep a cost, therefore to accept its heavy condicionalidades sends to the market the signal to be to the side of the bankruptcy.